« This just in! Thought leaders present future-forward ideas! | Main | The state of the State of the Union—LIVE tonight! »

January 27, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

That's certainly part of it. But the first answer implies that the employee should drive farther from home to work elsewhere (in which case he might get a better-paying job anyway, and would the hours make up for gas/mileage?), and he should get a degree/certification, etc. In other words, his low hours are entirely his fault. If only he just had the initiative!

In the second, why turn off a system before the new one is in place?

So, the answers either blame the employee or raise other questions.

Yep, well said, Diane. This may be a case of, "Better top-down communication than interactive communication like this."

Makes me want to cry.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner